Black- and Whitelist » oyees discover for themselves what could be impr

If there is one area that gives both managers and employees difficulty it is the need to give and accept effective feedback. It is one of the most crucial elements in assisting employees to improve their performance. It establishes a connection between what employees are doing and how their actions are perceived by others. Although receiving feedback is often under appreciated Bobby Okereke Jersey , those on the receiving end must occasionally be reminded that no feedback could be much worse.


Most managers consider themselves to be high achievers. Out of this mindset comes the need to want to move right into problem solving by directing staff to fix a problem in a specific way. This quick fix solution shouts loudly of their inexperience. More seasoned managers know the importance of effective communication and begin the feedback process by listening to their people. They encourage input into the situation in order to determine what may be interfering with getting the job done in the most effective way. Only after they have received input can they can gain a broader perspective of the situation and make appropriate recommendations for action.


Giving feedback is not about dishing out criticism; however, this often proves to be the case when managers find themselves under pressure. It is at these times that emotions get in the way of effective management and much is lost in the process.


Let's put this on a personal level. As a manager, you want to be liked by your employees. You have always resented those who misjudge you and who find fault without knowing the full story. You vowed that when you became a manager that you would not follow this course of action because you know this type of behavior does nothing to improve your performance but rather makes you mistrust people and devalue their capabilities.


"The young carry-out boy was asked, "How long have you been working here?" He replied, "Ever since they threatened to fire me." --Anonymous


Although numerous books have been written about the essential qualities of good leaders Parris Campbell Jersey , in my opinion, four qualities stand out: communication, trust, competence, and caring.


Effective leaders communicate clearly and inspire others to want to take action. Good leaders are good listeners. They pause often Ben Banogu Jersey , and acknowledge the presence of others. Most importantly, they stop talking and listen attentively. They build trust through what is said and done. Their competence is judged on how they make decisions and lead people. And, lastly they are people savvy. They are genuinely interested in others and get the job done through collaboration. Good leaders are not Lone Rangers. They do not expect others to be "just like them." But rather, they recognize and leverage the talents of others for the benefit of the entire organization.


Remember, even though you Rock Ya-Sin Jersey , as a manager, may dislike giving feedback, your employees expect and need it from you. The complaints are not usually about the necessity to improve, but how the situation was inappropriately handled.


Feedback should NOT be limited to the times you do Performance Evaluations but should be an ongoing process between a manager and her or his team. The results are good grades in the four qualities of effective leadership mentioned above.


TECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK


Rule of 3 x 3


effective feedbackBert Decker is his book, You've Got To Be Believed to be Heard Malik Hooker Jersey , talks about his 3 x 3 Rule when giving feedback. His method forces the manager to give balanced feedback by focusing on three strengths and three areas of development when analyzing performance and behavior. Capping it to three keeps the information succinct and easily remembered. Decker says, "Receiving three bits of feedback at a time allows people to make course corrections, like a guided missile, as they keep moving onward and upward. The goal is not to flatten someone's ego but rather to give them encouragement and to challenge them to improve.


Focus on Performance, Not Personality


The most effective way to discuss areas requiring improvement is to focus on observable actions Darius Leonard Jersey , not attitudes. By limiting your criticism to what you see with your own two eyes, it will help you refrain from judgments that can trigger a defensive reaction. An example might be, "I have heard you making a number of personal telephone calls lately, is there something going on that you need our support for?" That is better than saying, "You seem to be making a number of personal calls lately Andrew Luck Jersey , and this has become very disruptive."


Certain Words Create Problems


Words that are dangerous when evaluating performance are always, never, and worst. If you let slip any of these words, you are overstating your case and not focusing on actual performance. Far better to say, "I've seen you do this three times this week."


New managers who are not accustomed to providing feedback will often sound accusatory when they are trying to assert their authority. If this is you Peyton Manning Jersey , you will know you are on shaky ground if you find yourself using the word "you" followed by a negative comment. An example might be, "You didn't meet the deadline we agreed to." With this language, tensions will be inflamed and the result will be a resentful employee. Better to say, "We agreed to a Friday deadline. Can you tell me what problems you encountered?" This moves the employee into analyzing the situation rather than becoming defensive.


Use Questions to Give You Leverage


It is often helpful to let employees discover for themselves what could be improved. This tactic works especially well with high-ego performers who automatically resist any input they get as negative. Many new managers make the mistake of talking so much that employees feel like they are being scolded as a preschooler.